MODIS/Aqua Radiance Comparison to In Situ |
||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The updated LUT, among other changes, has resulted in a significant improvement in consistency of the annual cycle observed in the MODIS/Aqua deep-water nLw trends. The improvement is most significant for 2004 relative to previous years. The consistency is approaching that of SeaWiFS. | ||
Annual Repeatability of MODIS/Aqua Radiance Trends, Deep Water Subset |
||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Annual Repeatability of SeaWiFS Radiance Trends, Deep Water Subset |
||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Direct comparison of the deep-water trends to SeaWiFS over the common mission lifetime clearly shows improved agreement between the two sensors, especially toward end of mission. The f/Q correction significantly reduces some seasonal differences between the two sensors, thereby flattening the ratio trends. Some mid-mission bias in the comparison seems to be revealed after seasonal differences have been removed. Deep water chlorophyll was trending 30% high in operational results; trend is eliminated in reprocesing configuration; bias minimal with f/Q included. Agreement in aerosol optical thickness is much better after removing straylight-contaminated retrievals in MODIS/Aqua. | ||
Radiance Ratios to SeaWiFS, Deep Water Subset |
||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Chlorophyll Ratios to SeaWiFS, Deep Water Subset |
||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
AOT Ratios to SeaWiFS, Deep Water Subset |
||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The seasonal differences between SeaWiFS and MODIS/Aqua are most pronounced in mid to high southern latitudes. The regional trends indicate that the f/Q correction significantly reduces this assymetry. | ||
nLw Ratios to SeaWiFS, North Atlantic (AtlN) Subset |
||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
nLw Ratios to SeaWiFS, South Atlantic (AtlS) Subset |
||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
At higher southern latitudes, seasonal differences between SeaWiFS and MODIS/Aqua are still significant, and the relative improvement due to f/Q correction is not as pronounced. The cause of this high-southern-latitude disagreement may not be f/Q. | ||
nLw Ratios to SeaWiFS, PacN50 Subset |
||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
nLw Ratios to SeaWiFS, PacN20 Subset |
||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
nLw Ratios to SeaWiFS, PacS20 Subset |
||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
nLw Ratios to SeaWiFS, PacS50 Subset |
||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The next set of plots show global trends derived from binning three of the 4-day test periods centered on a winter and a summer solstice, with the data expressed as a function of latitude. Clear-water nLw comparison of SeaWiFS (dashed-line) with MODIS show that the proposed reprocessing configurations improve agreement between the sensors, with best agreement obtained using f/Q. The f/Q removes a substantial component of the north-south trend from the MODIS to SeaWiFS ratios, however, some systematic disagreement is still evident. Most notable is a substantial depression in the MODIS radiances relative to SeaWiFS (of order 10%) which occurs at ~40N in northern hemisphere winter and 40S in northern hemisphere summer, or about 63-deg solar zenith. This is clearly seen in the deep-water ratio trends. We are still investigating this effect. | ||
Latitude Trends, Clear Water nLw 551 Comparison to SeaWiFS 555 |
||
| Winter | ||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Summer | ||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Latitude Trends, Clear Water nLw Ratios to SeaWiFS |
||
| Winter | ||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Summer | ||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Latitude Trends, Deep Water nLw Ratios to SeaWiFS |
||
| Winter | ||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Summer | ||
| Current Operational Processing | Reprocessing #1 | Reprocessing #1 with f/Q |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Curator: OceanColor Webmaster
Authorized by: gene carl feldman |
Privacy Policy and Important Notices
Updated: 08 April 2005 |
|